This is generated by ChatGPT based on the article The Language of Shepherding
Criteria | Excellent (4) | Proficient (3) | Developing (2) | Needs Improvement (1) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Clarity of Problem Statement | Problem is clear and framed effectively. | Problem is clear but lacks some context. | Problem is somewhat vague. | Problem is poorly stated or unclear. |
Solution Alignment with Problem | Solution fully addresses the problem. | Solution addresses the problem but weak. | Solution somewhat addresses the issue. | Solution does not address the problem. |
Explanation of Forces | Forces fully developed and clear. | Forces present but could be stronger. | Forces mentioned but not integrated. | Forces poorly identified or missing. |
Real-World Examples | Examples are vivid and highly relevant. | Examples are relevant but lack detail. | Examples are vague or generic. | No real-world examples provided. |
Structure and Organization | Exceptionally well-organized. | Generally logical with some issues. | Structure is somewhat disjointed. | Poorly structured or missing sections. |
Context Appropriateness | Context is appropriately set. | Context is mostly appropriate. | Context is unclear or incomplete. | Context is missing or irrelevant. |
Convincing Solution | Solution is compelling and well-supported. | Solution is convincing but lacks detail. | Solution is somewhat convincing. | Solution is unconvincing. |
Writing Quality | Writing is engaging and error-free. | Writing is clear with minor issues. | Writing has noticeable errors. | Writing is unclear with frequent errors. |